The Internet: A Double-Edged Sword

The duality of the Internet stems from its inherent characteristics. It enables freedom of expression and connects individuals worldwide, but also exposes societies to risks like data breaches, misinformation, and cyberattacks. Governments worldwide are exploiting these risks to justify stringent control and censorship over the Internet, often under the pretext of copyright infringement or cyber-terrorism.

The Evolution of Governmental Control

Over the past 15 years, governments worldwide have waged a relentless battle against the sharing of culture in the name of an antiquated copyright regime. The Egyptian Internet black-out, the US government’s reaction to Wikileaks, the adoption of website blocking mechanisms in Europe, and the proposed plans for “Internet kill switches” stand testament to this growing control. Unsettled by the Internet’s potential, corporations and politicians have joined forces to curb this free flow of information.

The Sarkozy Paradigm

France’s president Nicolas Sarkozy is an exemplar of this trend towards increasing centralized control. He has called for a summit to establish a “civilized Internet”, a concept eerily borrowed from the Chinese government known for its censorship policies. Masked under fears of “cyber-terrorism”, Sarkozy’s objective seems to push for exceptional rules to establish Internet censorship, undermining free speech and other civil liberties. Under his rule, France has witnessed the disconnection of citizens from the Internet and the censorship of online content.

Packaging Policy under the Guise of Democracy and Responsibility

These restrictive policies are often framed under the guise of democracy and responsibility. However, the actions suggest otherwise. The Internet, designed to foster universal expression, is being increasingly dominated by those in power. This disparity raises concerns about the true purpose of these policies, which could be veiled attempts to convert the Internet into an instrument of control.